The Arian Controversy

1)     Introduction

2)     What is Arianism?

3)     First Council of Nicaea and its aftermath.

4)     Theological debates

5)     Theodosius and the Council of Constantinople

6)     Early Medieval Germanic Kingdoms

7)     "Arian “as a polemical epithet

8)     Arianism resurfaces after the Reformation, 16th century

9)     Jehovah’s Witnesses: the Modern Day Arians

10)The True Nature of Jesus

11)Erroneous Translations

i)       John 1:1

ii)    Colossians 1:15-17

iii)  Philippians 2:6

iv)   Titus 2:13

v)      Revelation 3:14

12)Objections to Jesus’ Divinity

13)CONCLUSION

14)BIBLIOGRAPHY

The Arian Controversy

Introduction

            Christianity had been involved theological controversies since Paul's time. In Paul's day, the relationship between Jewish and Gentile converts was on everyone's lips. Then came the Gnostic Speculation. These early controversies are no small matter, open sides drawn in bitter opposition. But in early Christianity solid argument and righteousness was the only means to win a debate. Such controversies were given no real attention by civil authorities and conflict within the church, therefore those in conflict had little desire to involve the authorities. This paper focuses the origin of Arianism and the formation of the creed of faith.

What is Arianism?

            Arianism is the theological teaching attributed to Ariues (AD 250-336), a Christian presbyter in Alexandria. As with many of the classical heresies, Arianism emerged from the Struggle to reach a consensus on the Trinity. It is named after Arius, whose main concern was that it did not seem fitting that God should have a son. His solution, which became known as Arianism, was to propose that the son (Jesus) was somewhere between God and Man.

            “Such is the genuine doctrine of Arius. Using Greek terms, It denies that the son is of One essence, nature, or substance with God; He is not consubstantial (homoousios) with the Father, and therefore not like Him, or equal in dignity, or co-eternal, or within the real sphere of Deity." [1]

            Modern Arianism Shares the ancient belief that Jerus was not (and thus is not) divine, but goes much further reducing Jerus to "just a guy." Influenced perhaps by Naturalism and Materialism, and thus uncomfortable with any Supernatural elements. Modern Arianism advocates that Jesus was a good and wise man, perhaps even a prophet, but certainly not divine.

            It could be argued that such an extreme view has gone beyond heresy to apostasy (Apostasy), thus changing Arianism from a church problem to a mission problem. The views so widely taught and embraced among liberal churches and seminaries, however, that it is probably unrealistic to dismiss them so easily.

Origin.

            Arius taught that God the Father and the son did not exist together eternally. Arians taught that the pre-incarnate Jesus was a divine being created by God the Father at Some point, before which the son did not exist. In English-language works. It is sometimes said that Arians believe that Jesus is or was a     “creature" in the sense of “Created being”. Arius and his followers appealed to Bible verses such as Jesus Saying that the father is “greater than I” (2) John 14:28, and " The Lord Created me at the beginning of his work" Proverb 8.22. The latter quote has provided Some Controversy because it is technically speaking of wisdom.[2]

However, many people, notably Jehovah's witnesses, believe that the wisdom in this Proverb Symbolizes Jesus Christ because he is later described in a similar way. On the contrary, the Verse. “I and the Father are one" John 10:30) delivers. The Homoousios doctrine.[3]

            Controversy over Arianism arose in the late 3rd Century and Persisted throughout most of the 4th century. It involved most church members-from simple believers, priest and monks to bishops, emperors and members of Rome's imperial family. Such a deep Controversy within the Church during this period of its development could not have materialized without significant historical influences providing a basis for the Arian doctrines. Some historians define and minimize the Arian conflict as the exclusive construct of Arius and a handful of rogue bishops engaging in heresy.[4]

But others recognize Arius as a defender of 'Original' Christianity, or as providing a conservative response against the politicization of Christianity seeking union with the Roman Empire of the roughly three hundred bishops is attendance of at the Council of Nicea, Only two bishops did not Sign the Nicene Creed, which condemned Arianism. Two Roman emperors, Constantius II and Valens, became Arians, as did prominent Gothic, vandal and Lombard warloads both before and after the fall of the Western Roman Empire.

Beliefs.

            Because virtually all extant written material on Arianism was written by its opponents, the nature of Arian teachings is difficult to define precisely today. The letter of Auxentius, 4th-century Arian bishops of Milan, regarding the missionary UIfilas, gives the clearest picture of Arian beliefs on the nature of the Trinity. God the Father ("unbegotten"), always existing, was separate from the lesser Jesus Christ ("only-begotten"), born before time began and creator of the world. The nature of the relationship between the Father and the Son Closely resembles the platonic philosophy of the Demiurge, in that the Father is Said to have immediately created the Son and the Son is said to have immediately created the world. Likewise, the Father, working through the son, created the Holy Spirit, Who was subservient to the Son as the Son was to the Father. The Father was seen as “the only true God" 1 corin: 8:5,[5]        Indeed, even though there may be so-called gods in heaven or on earth-as in fact there are there are many gods and many lords-yet for us there is one God, the Father, from whom are all things and for who we exist, and once Lord, Jesus Christ, through whom are all things and through whom we exist.

First Council of Nicaea and its aftermath.

            In 321, Arius was denounced by a synod at Alexandria for teaching a heterodox  view of the relationship of Jesus to God the Father. Because Arius and his followers had great influence in the schools of Alexandria-Counterparts to modern universities or Seminaries-their theological views spread, especially in the eastern Mediterranean.

 By 325, the Controversy had become significant enough that the Emperor Constantine Called as assembly of bishops, the First Council of NICACA, which condemned Arius' doctrine and formulated the Original Nicene Creed of 325. The Nicene Creeds Central terms, used to described the relationship between the father and the Son, is Homoousios (Ancient), Or Consubstantiality, meaning " of the same substance" or  "of one being". (The Athanasian Creed is less often used but it is more overtly anti-Arian Statement on the Trinity).

             The focus of the Council of Nicaea was the divinity of Christ. Arius taught that Jesus Christ was divine and was sent to earth for the Salvation of mankind but that Jesus Christ was not equal to the father and to the Holy Spirit. Under Arianism Christ was instead not consubstantial with god the father. Since both the father and the son under Arianism were made of "like" essence or being but not of the same essence or being Ousia is essence or being in Eastern Christianity and is the aspect of god that is completely in comprehensible to mankind and human perception. It is all that subsists by itself and which has not its being in another God the Father and God the son and God the Holy Spirit all being uncreated.

            According to the teaching of Arius the preexistent Logos and thus the incarnate Jesus Christ was a created being that only the Son was directly created and begotten by God the Father before ages, but was of a district, though similar ,essence  or substance from the Creator; his opponents argued that this would make Jesus less then God ,and that this was heretical much of the distinction between the differing factions was over the phrasing that  Christ expressed in the New Testament to express submission to god the father. The theological term for this submissions kenosis. This Ecumenical council declared that Jesus Christ was a district being of a dog in existence or reality (Hypostasis) which the Latin fathers translated as persona. Jesus was God in essence being and or nature (Ousia) which the Latin fathers translated as substantial

Theological debates

            The Council of Nicaea did not end the controversy as many bishop of the Eastern provinces disputed the homoousios, the central firm of the Nicene Creed as it had been used by Paul of Samosata, who had advocated a monarchianist Christology. Both the man and his teaching, including the term homoousios had been condemned by the synods of Antioch in 269

            Hence after Constantine’s death in 337, op0en dispute resumed again. Constantine's son Constantius II, who had become Emperor of the eastern part of the Empire ,actually encouraged the Arians and set out to reverse the Nicene creed .His advisor in these affairs was Eusebius of Nicomedia ,who had already at the council of Nicene been the head of the Arian party, who also was made bishop of Constantinople.

            As debates raged in an attempt to come up with a new formula, three camps evolved among the opponents of the Nicene Creed. The first group mainly opposed the Nicene terminology and preferred the term homoousios (a like in substance) to the Nicea homoousios, While they rejected Arius and his teaching and accepted the equality and co eternality of the person of the Trinity. Because of this centrist position, and despite their rejection of Arius, they were called "Semi -Arians" by their opponents. The second group also avoided invoking the name of Arius ,but in large part followed Arius 'teaching and ,in another attempted compromise wording ,described the son as being like (homoios) the Father. A third group explicitly called upon Arius and described the Son as unlike (anhomoios) the Father. Constantius wavered in his support between the first and the second party, while harshly persecuting the third. The debates among these resulted in numerous synods ,among them the Council of sardica in 343,the Council of Sirmium in 358 and the double Council of Rimini and Seleucia in 359,and no fewer than fourteen further creed formula between 340 and 360, leading the pagan observer Ammianus Marcellinus to cement sarcastically: 'The highways were covered with galloping bishops."None of this attempt was acceptable to the defenders of Nicene Orthodoxy: writing about the latter Councils, Saint Jerome remarked that the word "a woke with a groan to find itself Arian."[6]

Theodosius and the Council of Constantinople

It was not until the co-reigns of Gratian and Theodosius that Arianism was effectively wiped out among the ruling class and elite of the Eastern Empire.Theodosius'wife St Flacilla was instrumental in his campaign to end Arianism. Valens died in the Battle of Adrianople in 378 and was succeeded by Theodosius I, who adhered to the Nicene Creed. This allowed for settling the dispute.

Although much of the church hierarchy in the East had opposed the Nicene creed in the decaded leading up to Theodosius, accession, he managed to achieve unity on the basis of the Nicene creed. In 381, at the second Ecumenical Council in Constantinople, a group of mainly Eastern bishops assembled and accepted the Nicene Creed of 381. Which was supplemented in regard to the Holy Spirit, as well some other changes. This generally considered the end of the dispute about the Trinity and the end of Arianism among the Roman, Non-Germanic people.

Early Medieval Germanic Kingdoms

            The conflict in the 4th century had seen Arian and Nicene factions struggling for control of the Church. In contrast, in the Arian German kingdoms established on the wreckage of the Western Roman Empire in the 5th century, there were entirely separate Arian and Nicene Churches with parallel hierarchies, each serving different sets of believers. The Germanic elites were Arians, and the majority population was Nicene.

Remnants in the West, 5th-7th century

            However, much of southeastern Europe ,Including many of the Goths and Vandals respectively, Had embraced Arianism, which led to Arianism being a religious factor in various wars in the Roman Empire. In the west, Organized Arianism survived in North Africa, in Hispania, and parts of Italy until it was finally suppressed in the 6th and 7th centuries.[7]

"Arian “as a polemical epithet

            The term: Arian” bestowed by Athanasius upon his opponents in the Christological debate was polemical. Even in Athanasius’ Orations against the Arians, Arius hardly emerges consistently as the creative individual originator of the heresy that bears his name, even though it would have greatly strengthened Athanasius 'case to present him in that light .Arius was not really very important to general Arianism after his exile at Nicaea.

Arianism resurfaces after the Reformation, 16th century

            Following the Protestant Reformation from1517,it did not take along for Arian and other non-Trinitarian views to resurface. The first recorded English anti Trinitarian egad John Assheton who was forced to recant before Thomas Cranmer in 1548.At the Anabaptist Council of Venice 1550,the early Italian instigators of the Radical Reformation committed to the views of Miguel Srevet,and these were promulgated by Giorgio Biandrata and others in to Poland and Transylvania.

Arians due to their rejection of the Trinity, though in fact the Sicilians, as they were later known, went further than Arius to the position of photinus.

            The Christology of Jehovah's witnesses is also generally regarded as Arian, given their views on development of the Trinity. In connection with this Jehovah’s witnesses also believe the Holy Spirit is not an actual Person but rather is God's divine breath; God's power in action, related to another ancient doctrine called Macedonians. The adherents of which were called Pneumatomachi (Greek for "fighters of the Spirit")

Jehovah’s Witnesses: the Modern Day Arians

Despite the best efforts of the Orthodox Church to stamp out Arianism, there are branches of the belief that continue to this present day. One of them is the Jehovah’s Witnesses. Founded in the mid to late nineteenth century by Charles Take Russell, this group contains several million adherents in numerous countries. Like the ancient Arians, these modern day Witnesses believe that Jesus is a created being who is therefore not eternal and not God. They specifically argue that Jesus was Michael the Archangel.  However, by examining a number of Scriptures, their contentions do not hold up.

The True Nature of Jesus

Despite the best efforts of the Witnesses, there is no Biblical support for the contention that Jesus is inferior to the Father. In fact, one can make a strong positive case for the deity of Christ. First, in John 20:28, Thomas states to Jesus, “My Lord and my God.” Metzger points out that it is strange that Jesus made no effort to correct him, but Jesus accepts and commends Thomas’s statement of faith (v. 29). Second, in Acts 7:59, Stephen prays to Jesus. Metzger makes an insightful comment, “If therefore the opinion of the Jehovah’s Witnesses be correct, namely, that Jesus is only a spirit creature, then Stephen was an idolater in praying to one who was not truly God.”8 Third, in Galatians 1:1, Metzger comments, “Paul clearly distinguishes Jesus Christ from men and ranges him with God the Father.”[8] He uses two prepositions with man and men, but only one preposition with reference to God the Father and Jesus. Paul was Jewish and a strict monotheist something which he does not dispute. In fact, “Even those, whom he combats in this Epistle to the Galatians, the Judaizers, so far as we can see, had no quarrel with Paul’s lofty view of Christ.”  

Fourth, John 10:30 records Jesus as stating, “I and my Father are one.” The Jews attempt to stone him because they understood him to be claiming deity (v. 33), which was something Jesus did not dispute. Metzger points out the Witnesses attempts to get around the obvious implications of this passage, [9]“The marginal note of their translation, suggesting that ‘are one’ means ‘are at unity,’ is an alternative interpretation which is so lacking in justification that the translators did not dare to introduce it into the text itself.” Again, the Jews understood his claim and attempted to kill Him. Metzger comments, “Psychologically, there was no reason for them to become angry at Jesus if all he asserted was his being one in purpose and outlook with the Father.”

Fifth, Metzger points out that the New Testament writers often quote passages in the Old Testament that refer to Jehovah and refer them to Jesus.13 Joel 2:32 states, “Whosoever shall call on the name of the Lord shall be saved.” However, Romans 10:13 quotes the exact passage, but refers to Jesus as “the Lord” of the passage in 10:9. “If you confess with your mouth Jesus is Lord” and then in verse 13 states, “Whosoever shall call on the name of the Lord shall be saved.”[10] There is a clear correlation between Jesus and deity. Metzger does well to conclude the evidence stating, “As has often been pointed out, Jesus’ statement is either true or false. If it is true, then he is God. If it is false, he either knew it to be false or he did not know it to be false. If while claiming to be God he knew this claim to be false, he was a liar. If while claiming to be God he did not know this claim to be false, he was demented. There is no other alternative.”

Erroneous Translations

The Jehovah’s Witnesses are not lacking from purposely mistranslating the Bible to demonstrate that Jesus is inferior to the Father. They perform this with a number of faulty translations of key divinity passages.

John 1:1

According to the New World Translation, The Word was “a god.” The Witnesses do this since there is no definite article present. Metzger responds, “By using here the indefinite article ‘a’ the translators have overlooked the well-known fact that in Greek grammar nouns may be definite for various reasons, whether or not the Greek definite article is present.”[11] Furthermore, if the Witnesses accept this translation, they must be polytheists. Finally, Metzger elaborates on a principle called Colwell’s rule which indicates, “A definite predicate nominative has the article when it follows the verb; it does not have the article when it precedes the verb.” It is indefinite only when the context demands it. In fact, this statement without a definite article is not strange in a Johannine context.

Colossians 1:15-17

Another passage that Witnesses attempt to distort is Col. 1:15-17 where they translate “For by him all other things were created.” The other is not present in the original Greek. Metzger comments, “As a matter of fact, the ancient Colossian heresy which Paul had to combat resembled the opinion of modern Jehovah’s Witnesses, for some of the Colossians advocated the Gnostic notion that Jesus was the first of many other created intermediaries between God and men.” Second, the verb “to create” in reference to Son and Father is not here. Likewise, the reference to the “firstborn of creation” does not indicate inferiority to God, but primacy over creation. Metzger comments, “What God begets is God; just as what mail begets is mail. What God creates is not God; just as what man makes is not mail.” In fact, in the same book, Col. 2:9 mentions deity of Christ with the present tense of “dwells” indicating that the fullness of God dwells in Jesus bodily.

Philippians 2:6

Another instance of the Jehovah’s Witnesses mistranslating passages is found in Philippians 2:6 which they translate as, “Christ Jesus, who, although he was existing in God’s form, gave no consideration to a seizure, namely, that he should be equal to God.” However, this flatly contradicts a number of other translations. J.H. Thayer states, “Who, although he bore the form of God, yet did not think that this equality with God was to be eagerly clung to or returned.” Arthur S. Way likewise translates, “He, even when He subsisted in the form of God, did not selfishly cling to His prerogative of equality with God.” Finally, J.B. Phillips translates, [12]“For He, Who had always been God by nature, did not cling to His prerogatives as God’s Equal, but stripped Himself of all privilege by consenting to be a slave by nature and being born as mortal man.” Therefore, the Jehovah’s Witnesses translation is contrary to modern New Testament Greek scholarship.

Titus 2:13

Witnesses likewise mistranslate Titus 2:13 with “and of our Savior” which separates “our great God and Savior Jesus Christ.” Metzger explains a rule which contradicts this mistranslation by the Jehovah's Witnesses, “This rule, in brief, is that when the copulative kai connects two nouns of the same case, if the article precedes the first noun and is not repeated before the second noun, the latter always refers to the same person that is expressed or described by the first noun.” Other scholars agree. Therefore, in contrast to the Watchtower, this passage teaches the connection between Jesus as Savior and God.

Revelation 3:14

Another passage that the witnesses distort is found in Revelation 3:14. They make Christ refers to himself as “the beginning of the creation by God.” However, the genitive means “of God” not “by God.” This correlates with the Pauline notion “that Christ is the origin, or primary source, of God’s creation” (cf. Jn. 1:3).

Objections to Jesus’ Divinity

Objection

In response to the Trinitarians, Arius (and the Witnesses) points out that the “divinity” passages are really just speaking of Jesus in an honorific way. God is still quite different than the Son. Arius argued that “the language of ‘son ship’ is variegated in character, and metaphorical in nature. To refer to the ‘Son’ is an honorific, rather than theologically precise, way of speaking.” God is still totally different in essence from the Son.

Response

Athanasius provides an excellent response to Arius’ objection. First, he argues that only God can save. He states, “An essential feature of being a creature is that one requires to be redeemed. No creature can save another creature. Only the creator can redeem the creation.” However, according to Christian theology, Jesus is the Savior. Athanasius produced a syllogism: Only God can save; Jesus Christ saves; therefore, Jesus Christ is God (50).28 Second, Athanasius points out that Christians worship and pray to Jesus Christ. However, “Christians . . . are totally forbidden to worship anyone or anything except God himself.”29 Therefore, according to Arius and the Jehovah’s Witnesses, Christians are practicing idolatry. Arius was not able to significantly refute this, nor can the Jehovah’s Witnesses today.

Objection

Witnesses love to point out that the word Trinity is no where found in the Bible. Therefore, it must not be true.

Response

The absence of the word “Trinity” does not disprove the fact that there is one. Metzger comments, “The fallacy of such an argument will be brought home to them by pointing out that their favorite term, ‘theocracy,’ likewise appears nowhere in the Bible. In neither case, however, does the absence of the word for ‘Trinity’ or the word for ‘God’s rule’ (theocracy) imply that the realities expressed by these two words are absent from the Scripture.” Furthermore, there are a number of texts that demonstrate a Trinitarian pattern.

Objection

Witnesses point out that the New Testament speaks of the subordination of the Son to the Father such as in John 14:28 where Jesus states, “My Father is greater than I.”[13]

Response

The Witnesses are correct to point out that Jesus is subordinate to the Father, but this applies to His operation as in John 14:28, not His very being or essence. Metzger comments regarding the Athanasian Creed, “Equal to the Father, as touching His Godhead: and inferior to the Father, as touching His manhood.” Calvin likewise comments, “Christ does not here compare the divinity of the Father with his own, nor his own human nature with the divine essence of the Father; but rather his present condition with the celestial glory to which he would be presently received.” Second, Jesus is speaking in a context about comforting his disciples in light of his departure. Since he was going to submit to the cross, the explanation of the Father’s greatness would be fitting. However, he is not speaking about his creation or denying his eternality. Third, in like manner, Paul speaks of a number of modes of Jesus operation: 1 Cor. 3:23; 11:3; 15:24, and 28. Paul does not say what subjection means; however, one must recognize the clear teaching elsewhere in Paul.

Objection

Witnesses often object to the notion of the Trinity due to the fact that it seems to be polytheistic and illogical and eliminates the majesty of God’s being.[14]

Response

Though one could understand the Trinity in a polytheistic context, the Trinity in fact better explains the operation of God. For example, how can God always love if there was no one for him to love before creation? There would have to be another person for this love to take place. Metzger comments, “But these words, ‘God is love,’ have no real meaning unless God is at least two Persons.” There must be a Lover, a Loved, and a Spirit of love. God must always love if it is part of His essence. Further, there can be no self-consciousness without various persons in the Godhead. This is not to deny that the Trinity is mysterious. Metzger rightly admits, “How in the unity of the Godhead there can be three persons of one substance, power, and eternity is a mystery beyond human comprehension.” However, a god that we could completely understand would not be worthy of our worship. Therefore, the Trinity is perfectly compatible with the majesty and oneness of God.

CONCLUSION

            Arianism totally denies the divinity of Jesus Christ. The fundamental Premise of Arius was the uniqueness of God, who is alone self existent and immutable. The Son, who is not self existent, can't be God. Nicea Creed is the basic faith Principle formatted from Church Councils. If anyone who is rejecting the divinity or humanity of Jesus is resulted the heretical teaching. Biblical narratives heart fully accepts this two natures of Jesus. Especially Pauline writings gave equal importance of humanity and Divinity of Jesus Christ. In Person, Jesus Christ as the central idea of the salvation of human history.

Arianism did not simply influence several theologians in the early centuries of Christianity; its impact affected the emergence of Orthodoxy. Brown comments that Arianism gave “the church the first standard by which orthodoxy could be reliably measured.”36 The Arian controversy was the first controversy to be decided by an ecumenical council. This impact continues today with groups such as the Jehovah’s Witnesses who deny the deity of Christ. However, despite their best efforts, their arguments do not square with the Biblical evidence. Instead, their Jesus lacks the power to save. Metzger rightly points out the effects of the Witnesses view, “While he was on earth he was nothing more than a man, and therefore the atoning effect of his death can have no more significance than that of a perfect human being.” Further, if a sect’s basic orientation regarding Jesus Christ be errant, it must be seriously doubted whether the name ‘Christian’ can rightly be applied to such a system.” However, despite the negative evaluation the Christian “has the joyous confidence that his divine Lord’s mediatorial work is sufficient to bring into heaven itself not only 144,000, but a great multitude which no man can number.”

---

[1] (Http: //www.newadvent.org/cathen/017107 c.hrm).

[2] http:// tools.wmflabs.org/bible verse finder/bibleversefinder.php? book =% 20 John &verse=14.28&src = !)

[3] (http://tools.unflabs.org/bibleverse finder/bible versefinder.php? book = % 20 John& verse= 10.30&src = NIV

[4] File:11/C: Users/Hp/Desk top/ Ariansim-wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[5] (http://tools.wmflabs.org/bibleversefinder/bibleverse finder.php? book=% 20Corinthians&verse= 8:6 & src=!).

[6] Grilmeier Aloys, Christ in Christian tradition, vol.1,219-48

[7]           Grilmeier Aloys, Christ in Christian tradition, vol.1,219-273

[8] Grilmeier Aloys, Christ in Christian tradition, vol.1,520-550

[9] Metzger, Bruce M. "The Jehovah's Witnesses and Jesus Christ: A Biblical and Theological Appraisal." Theology Today. (April, 1953): 65-85

[10] Grilmeier Aloys, Christ in Christian tradition, vol.1,520-550

[11] McGrath, Alister E. Historical Theology: An Introduction to the History of Christian Thought. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 1998.

[12] H. M. Gwatkin, Studies of Arianism (2d ed. 1900); J. H. Newman, The Arians of the Fourth Century (1933, repr. 1968);

[13] J. Pelikan, The Emergence of the Catholic Tradition (1971)

[14] Brown, Harold O. J. Heresies: Heresy and Orthodoxy in the History of the Church. Grand Rapids: Hendrickson, 1988.

microchip implant : the ultimate threat for humankind !

 
                             
                                           Applied Digital Solutions'  'verichip'...


1. Introduction

    Electronic chips became so 'ordinary' nowadays that we don't even think about them anymore. They are everywhere : in our calculators, our computers, our household appliance etc.

    For a couple of years, we also have been finding them on our bank cards, social security cards, credit cards and even...on our identity cards ! Microchips that are very close to those that are spoken of in this article are also implanted under the skin of animals, which contain medical data (name, vaccinations etc.); they also allow to identify them, to localize them, to track them so that you can find them back by satellite when they got lost or escaped.

    In one word, what was yesterday part of science-fiction is reality nowadays...

    But let's go on with the thought : if one succeeded implementing that technique on animals,
    why couldn't we do the same thing on human beings ?

    This is technically and technologically possible, anyway. Of course, we have legal, moral and ethical rules and also the Human Rights (that are flouted every day) to 'protect' us... But are those fences truly sufficient and efficient ?
     A priori, the hypothesis of a microchip implanted on humans on a huge scale could be thought as pure paranoïa... But after the reading of this article, maybe you'll change your mind. What was being prepared - without our knowledge ! - fortunately appeared, and a nightmarish scenario will - MAYBE ! - be avoided thanks to us, thanks to YOU, if you react in time ! So, GET UP ! Today, the time has come to act for you, for your children and for future generations, or this planet will soon be crowded with zombies that will be guided by the will of those who will have implanted them the microchip...

    And now, please read this article till the end and let it help you make up your mind. The choice is yours... Yet, I hope that you'll choose to move, because the things we're going to talk about are happening HERE AND NOW ! You can also check out if this is the truth by going to the links that are added at the end of this article (point 9 : sources and references).

                            


2. History of the subcutaneous microchip



    The subcutaneous microchip is not a brand new invention; it's been worked on for more than 30 years, as the testimony of Dr. Sanders shows.
     Dr. Carl W. Sanders is an electronics engineer and an inventor who worked for many governmental organizations and companies such as IBM, General Electric, Honeywell and Teledyn. For 32 years, he worked in the bio-medical field, focusing on microchips.
     In 1968, he takes part to a research project regarding a 'spinal bridge' in order to heal a lady whose spine had been severely injured. The goal was to find a solution to link the motor nerves etc. That project led to the creation of a microchip that reloads itself automatically thanks to the human body's temperature variations, which gives it an almost unlimited life expectancy. In order to do so, the microchip is equiped with a thermo-electrical reloading circuit, and with a small reusable lithium battery. It's interesting to note that back then, lithium was used a lot, notably by the NASA.
     Dr. Sanders was confirmed by a doctor of Boston Medical Centre that if the microchip broke inside a human body, the lithium would cause a severe and painful wound filled with pus. But despite that danger, 'one' still decided to use a lithium battery for the microchip...
     After spending $1.5 millions in that purpose, it was found that the two places of the human body where temperature changes more quickly are the forehead (just down the hairline) and the back of the hand.
     Because of financial considerations (the microchip 'was not bringing enough money'), the ones responsible for the project were told that they were to find new applications for that chip...
      As it had been noticed that the microchip's frequency changes had some effects on the patient's behaviour once the microchip had been implanted in the body, 'one' oriented the researches on the possibility to modify human behaviour with the help of the microchip. The microchip could broadcast a signal stimulating different parts of the brain. It was possible, by example, to raise the adrenaline rate, which caused a change of behaviour...
    Furthermore, according to the discoveries made by Carl Sanders and his team, birth control can be implemented through the use of the chip. The chip stops the production of hormones in the area  of the pituitary gland, which causes an instant menopause. This was studied in India and in other parts of the world. The ultimate purpose of the powers controlling the world is to reduce the global  population of 90% : a size that is easier to control, according to them.
     During a meeting with members of the C.I.A. and important personalities such as Henry Kissinger (ancient american secretary of State who's in favour of a New World Order and who has a more than dubious past; under president Nixon, he personally supervised the major operations of the C.I.A. and of the F.B.I. , and commanded the military officials), it was brought to Dr. Sanders' attention that, in order to be able to control the population, it was necessary to IDENTIFY it first.
  So the project had to be reoriented once again, and they added to the microchip the ability of recording (and restoring) data that could include the name and the face of the individual, his social security number (with international codes), his fingerprints, his physical description, his family genealogy, his address, his job, informations regarding his taxes reports and his medical records. The 'restoring' of the data can be done thanks to a special scanner that analyzes and processes the data contained in the microchip...
     In that time, Dr. Sanders was working for the company “Lucent Technologies”. He baptized his subcutaneous microchip for humans the “#BT952000”. During the invention and the set up of the #BT952000 chip, the computer that Sanders was using was a “Data-Net 30”… That computer already had a 18 bit name divided in 3 groups of 6 bits (6,6,6), to be precise. Sanders (who wasn’t a believer back then and who didn’t pay attention to numbers and such things) also used for the microchip, logically and by convenience, a name corresponding to 18 bit, divided in 3 groups of 6 bit (6,6,6).   Afterwards, Dr. Sanders realized that he was fooled and that he actually took part to the creation of an awful device, that could even be the “mark of the Beast” described in St John’s Revelations (see point 6 of this article). He became a believer afterwards, and he now goes around the world to warn people about that kind of technology…
  
                                                             
                    Two different kinds of scanners designed to read the unique number of the subcutaneous microchip for humans and to link that number to an online database. On the left, the handheld model, on the right, the 'portal' model... 
     Among its components, the microchip has a transmitter-receiver that sends a digital signal based on pulsions that transmits 85 data elements. It also transmits, at regular intervals, a signal digitally created. Used as a relay, this signal sends important informations, eventually being used in order to localize the implanted person. The bearer of the microchip thus becomes a 'living antenna' that can be spotted any time by satellite !!!
     Dr. Sanders took part to 17 meetings around the world (including Brussels and Luxemburg) where those matters were discussed in the aim of a worldwide government and of a worldwide currency. (Before laughing to the idea of a worldwide currency, look at the evolution in Europe, for instance : national currencies were replaced by a supranational currency – the euro; furthermore, take a look at the “Terra” project that the Da Vinci Institute and the Future of Money summit prepare for us, for it clearly is a worldwide currency project. For further informations about it, please go to http://www.paroledevie.org/base/articles/html/A278_terra.htm or to http://www.futureofmoneysummit.com/terra-project.php ).
   Realizing the terrifying possibilities of the microchip, Carl Sanders, after finishing the project, decided to do prevention and to warn populations about the dangers that the subcutaneous microchip represents. This microchip, thanks to miniaturization, doesn't measure more than one millimetre, contains 250.000 elements and can be implanted under the skin thanks to a hypodermic syringe and under a local anesthetic.
    One of the first identification microchips was the TX1400L transponder made by the Destron company (U.S. patents 4730188 and 5041826), originally designed for animals BUT whose commercial stated that “although it was designed to be injected in animals, this transponder may be used for other applications requiring an identification tag” !
    Dr Daniel Man was the first to get a patent in the U.S.A. for a microchip used on humans. He wanted to find back lost or kidnapped kids…
    Jack Dunlap, an entrepreneur from Arizona, proposed the KIDSCAN system. That device was supposed to track the implanted children whose chip would have send signals to the satellites… That system, fortunately, never saw the light of day… But right now, such systems do exist, including for children ! We’re going to check this out in the sequel of this article…    
    It is important to notice that children always were a particular priority and target in the development of subcutaneous microchips for humans. The reason for this interest in children is developed in point 5 (How “they” will try to make people accept the microchip implant).

 
                       
Implanted under the skin with a hypodermic syringe and through a local anesthesy process...

3. What about today ?
     At the moment where medicine uses micro-surgery  and begins to use small “electronic pills” that take pictures of our inner body (regarding that subject, go to http://www.givenimaging.com  and get some information about the pill-camera M2A); in a time where it is more and more spoken about “nanotechnology” (a technology that is miniaturized to a microscopic or even molecular scale); now that the abortion pill is in sale in pharmacies, that contraceptive implants are used and that some genetic experiments on embryos were adopted; now that cloning experiments have begun, that cellphones are massively commercialised (those cellphones whose waves and frequency are dangerous for your health), what do we notice ?
 ·        First of all, we were progressively brought to adopt barcodes, then microchips on our cards (bank cards, social security cards, credit cards and even identity cards for some countries - the new Belgian identity card is a good example), and finally implanted microchips placed under the skin of animals and called “transponders”.

The question being : what will be the next step ???

·        Then, we now have performing orientation or localization systems that works thanks to  satellites (relay antennas and the GPS - Global Positioning System - by example)

·        Our discoveries regarding chemical, bacteriological or nuclear weapons progressed

·        Governmental systems and their institutions went over the conception of the nation and are more and more based on international groups (U.N., W.T.O., O.E.C.D., I.M.F., the world bank etc.) that transforms more and more into worldwide organizations

·        Economy prevails on loads of things and metamorphoses itself into globalization, with a hegemony of multinational companies whose power is so important that it’s sometimes bigger than the power of some countries

·        Medias have a huge impact on populations; the systems of transmission and information are faster than ever


But what’s up regarding the subcutaneous microchip ?

         Well, today, the microchip is part of what is named the “RFID” technologies (for Radio Frequency Identification Devices), or of the ICT implants (implants of the Internet and Communication Technologies).

         In the United States of America, it’s possible for any citizen, since the end of 2002, to get the microchip implant for the “modest” amount of 200 dollars !!! The company A.D.S. (Applied Digital Solutions Inc.), through its subsidiary company “Verichip”, was indeed authorized to commercialise its revolting microchip implant that is also named “verichip”. The verichip, in its current version, works with handheld proprietary scanners/readers, and with online databases that give all the information (public AND private) necessary. In a very close future, a GPS-based verichip,  just like the cellphones that we all know, will work with relay antennas and the GPS satellite system. Its bearer will become totally localizable from space. For further information, please go to : http://www.adsx.com or to : http://www.4verichip.com

        Furthermore, this microchip implant has a serial number containing 18 digits, and that number is divided in 3 groups of 6 digits (6, 6, 6… does this remind you anything ?).
“But where’s the problem ?”, will you think, since those good people chose that option in all liberty ? Well, the problem lies here : there are law projects that passed through the American Congress and that will allow to inject the microchip implant to children from birth, under so-called “identification purposes”. Moreover, the president of the U.S.A., following article 100 of the 1986 law on control of immigration, has the power to decide any kind of identification measure that he finds necessary, including a subcutaneous microchip.    The microchip implant  was already used during the Gulf war in august 1991; it has  already been tested on soldiers, government officials and on the personnel of some enterprises. If we don't fight, soon it will be too late and the chip will become mandatory for all to get !

   Still in the USA, the ex-attorney general (who’s also a general), John Ashcroft, allowed the development of “internment camps for civilians”. In a video called “Gulag USA”, it was proved that these camps are full of torture devices, but also of devices allowing to implant prisoners with the subcutaneous microchip !!! During World War II, nazis would “mark” prisoners at the entrance of the camps thanks to tattoos… Nowadays, the USA, in these camps for civilians, would mark the prisoners (civilians !) with subcutaneous microchips in order to identify them and to follow their slightest move !

   Even scarier : lately, the U.S. independent press warned about the existence of a project that will make the “chipping” of the homeless mandatory in 5 States, including New York and California ! So this means that the microchip will begin to become MANDATORY, starting with the weakest parts of the population ! The pretext invoked makes an amalgam between the homeless and the criminals (the homeless “become criminals easily”) !!!  

   In October 2004, the Food and Drug Administration gave the authorization to the verichip to be used in U.S. hospitals “for medical purposes”,  even though this disgusting implant represents dangers for people’s health (see chapter 4 : the true dangers of the microchip and of its functioning) !!! Question : who, during his/her lifetime, doesn’t go to the hospital at least once ? If one begins to “chip” sick people in hospitals for so-called “medical monitoring” purposes, the whole population will be chipped sooner or later !!!

   The Food and Drug Administration definitively classified the verichip as a “class II medical device requiring special controls” !

   American intellectuals and CEO’s also began to be “chipped” !

   And the verichip begins to be used in American hospitals ! For instance, the Boston-based Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center installed in its emergency room verichip scanners/readers, and gets ready to chip the patients !!!


   Still in the U.S.A. , a bus called the “Chipmobile” drives through the different states, trying to encourage people to get chipped ! And when they find a place where plenty unaware people are interested in getting chipped, Verichip Corporation builds a verichip center to spread the chip and its influence !

   Finally, always in the U.S.A. , here are the latest alarming news : a former Wisconsin governor and ex-secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services under George W. Bush, Tommy Thompson, has just joined the Applied Digital Solutions board of directors and should get 'chipped' very soon.

 BUT THE MOST HORRIBLE THING IS THAT HE JUST PROPOSED A BILL (July 2005). AND THAT BILL, IF IT'S ADOPTED, WOULD ALLOW THE CHIPPING OF ALL U.S. CITIZENS !!!


   In September 2005, after the ravages caused by the hurricane 'Katrina', Verichip Corporation chipped the corpses of the victims of this terrible natural disaster. Some more free advertisement for the scums from Verichip Corp. ! Besides, some stocks of microchips were made in Louisiana and in Mississipi, 'just in case there would be other natural disasters'...

But the microchip doesn’t make ravages only in the U.S.A. , and right now we can even say that all parts of the world are concerned by this terrible problem ! See below…

  A little while ago, Applied Digital Solutions (the company that commercialises the subcutaneous microchip) signed trade agreements with new countries for the “Verichip” and the “Digital Angel”. This is how Mexico, South Korea, Venezuela, Argentina, Colombia, the Caribbean Islands, the Dominican Republic, Puerto Rico, Brazil, Paraguay, Uruguay, Chile, Central America and South Africa were contaminated, in just a couple of months, by the phenomenon of the microchip implant. In Mexico and in Brazil, kids are even being 'chipped' !

   A little while ago, the attorney general of Mexico was implanted with the verichip, along with some employees of his !!!

   And Malaysia just got microchips (of a different brand than those of Applied Digital Solutions) that could, among other uses, be implanted under the skin “to identify people”…

   Malaysia also just adopted the verichip; some Asian countries, indeed, just signed an agreement with Applied Digital Solutions and Verichip Corp. for the purchase and distribution, spread on 3 years, of 65,825 verichips and 4,687 scanners minimum ! These countries are Malaysia, Indonesia, Thaïland and South Korea !

   Canada, through British Columbia, has just been contaminated : Applied Digital Solutions, indeed, has submitted a bid to buy a British Columbia-based company. This B.C. company is called EXI Wireless Inc. This purchase will add more or less 200 retailers and distributors to Verichip Corporation !!! The purpose, which is clearly admitted, is to spread and distribute to the maximum the verichip in american and Canadian hospitals !

   And, from now on, Africa, Singapore, Taiwan and Saudi Arabia also have their authorized Verichip distributor !

   In November 2003, during a safety fair in Paris, Applied Digital Solutions’ boss made a sensational statement, revealing that the verichip could be the “ultimate means of protection” and that could even bring people to a cashless society ! So it seems that the purpose to use the subcutaneous microchip for humans as a “worldwide currency” and that Carl W. Sanders warned us about is confirmed !!!

   After the earthquakes and tsunami that ravaged Asia at the end of 2004, some corpses were “chipped” for later identification, and also in order to “avoid epidemics” and to allow the harshly struck families not to suffer even more, knowing that one of theirs would “rest in an anonymous grave”.  These arguments are actually humanistic or medical pretexts given to present those chips as “useful”, “convenient” and “unavoidable” to the eye of the public opinion.

 Finally, regarding Europe, Applied Digital Solutions just found a distributor in… Spain (where the “terrorist” attacks happened in March 2004…a “coïncidence” ?) ; in the United Kingdom (great friend of the U.S.A.), it was decided to follow the movement of worldwide dictatorship, since Applied Digital Solutions, via its fully owned subsidiary Verichip Corp., signed commercial agreements with a London-based company, Surge IT Solutions, for the distribution of the
verichip : 9,000 subcutaneous microchips for humans and 110 scanners were ordered !  Switzerland and Russia also joined the “microchip countries”, ordering a certain amount of “verichip” microchip implants and of “verichip reader” scanners, and lately, it’s the Netherlands, Italy and Germany (September 2005 for Germany) that were touched by this scourge ! So, Europe is not spared, and the subcutaneous microchip for humans is already present on the European ground !!!

 More than 30 countries around the world (including European countries) are thus already touched by the scourge of the microchip implant ! All of this seems to confirm the “worldwide plan” that Dr. Karl W. Sanders denounced a long time ago !

Worse : in Barcelona, Spain, a nightclub company  called “Baja Beach Club” uses the verichip as a subscription for its faithful customers and for its V.I.P. . The owner of the nightclub company encourages people to get chipped ! Since June 2004, the verichip is also proposed  in the Baja Beach Club in Rotterdam (the Netherlands) ! Following the last informations,  the verichip will be proposed pretty soon in a new Baja Beach Club in Cologne (Germany)… A bar, named the Bar Soba, in Glasgow, U.K. (the United Kingdom, let’s not forget, has its official verichip distributor), also proposes the verichip to his regulars, and its boss, what a “conincidence”, also got chipped…at the Baja Beach Club, in Barcelona  !  Could the verichip become a “fashion gadget” ? Everything is  tried in order to do so…

   In Italy, the verichip was introduced since April 2004… in a hospital, in Rome, and it received an award in march 2005 !

   In France, the government foresaw, for the elderly people residing in nursing homes, RFID chip bracelets or… a verichip implant !!! And Verichip Corporation planned to find, by the end of 2005, a reliable distributor for France !

 Always in Europe, the development of chip identity cards and transponders
(= subcutaneous microchips) for animals, notably as a consequence of the so-called “terrorist peril” that threatens us all and is a pretext for everything and anything, shows us that us, humans,  could follow the same way very soon, even more now that the subcutaneous microchip for humans (the “verichip”) is already on our ground !

 RECENTLY, the European ethics group for sciences and new technologies gave to the European commission a report on “ICT implants” (implants of the new technologies of information and communication), and the subcutaneous microchip is part of them !

 In this report, the “ethics” group recognizes the dangers of the implant regarding privacy but also regarding “human identity” and the “individual subjectivity”  (so, the influence of these implants on free-agency and on behavioural control is recognized !) ! But this “ethics” group also recognizes the “beneficial” use of the microchip at the medical level ! And at a non medical level, it considers that if the legislator is in a situation obliging him to use that technology for SURVEILLANCE or more (that kind of extreme situation is, of course, not précised or described in the report), then the use of this kind of implant should be authorized !

  On a still scarier note, this report tells us about CEREBRAL implants and speaks about the “human improvement”, notably regarding the persons having light genetic malformations as well as deseases or deficiencies and other abnormalities that are not visible at first sight !!! Are we back in the Nazis era, with their stupid “superman” theory and the elimination or exploitation of the weak, the handicapped etc. ?

  The G29 (an advisory committee of the European commission) released a report on RFID. This report, in substance, recognizes the dangers of RFID for privacy, BUT RECOMMENDS NO ACTION OR REGULATION BEFORE MISUSES WERE COMMITTED !

  So Europe is more than ever threatened by this liberticide and hyper dangerous technology !

Finally, another type of microchip (called RFID tag or RFID microchip = radio frequency identification device) can be put on consumer goods, for some “logistic” reasons. This system is already used by the U.S. Army for a while, but private companies begin to use it too : Gillette razors and Benetton clothes, and also the supermarkets “Carrefour”, will put on their products tiny chips transmitting signals that, officially, would allow them to “supply the stores” with their products as soon as these stores don’t have their products anymore. But who knows the role of those “tiny spies” that we could bring back home ? Some consumer groups already (and rightly) denounce this invasion of privacy…

Question : Is Applied Digital Solutions’ verichip the ONLY microchip implant for humans?

NO, absolutely not ! At the moment, Applied Digital Solutions’ verichip is simply the chip that is talked about the most in the medias. The disgusting microchip implants for humans market tends to expand itself, and as an idea (good or bad) that brings money on a potentially very juicy market is often followed by different concurrent companies (and despite any morality and ethics), we currently see other chip producing companies that adopt those damned microchip implants for humans !

That is how, for instance, the European company TROVAN, also commercialises a subcutaneous microchip for humans (see the site http://www.trovan.com). There are 2 models of that chip implant : the Trovan ID 100IH, and the Trovan ID 100IH/A. The difference between these two models is not told, but maybe that one of them is a “passive” model, and that the other one is an “active” model…
The worst is that Trovan already has many official distributors ! Indeed, Trovan products are already used by 80 governmental agencies and by more than 20 countries !
Argentina, Australia, the Benelux (Belgium, the Netherlands and Luxemburg), Brazil, Canada, Chile, Costa Rica, Tchek Repiblic, Germany, Greece, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Mexico, Paraguay, Peru, Poland, Russia, Scandinavia (Sweden, Norway, Finland, Denmark), Slovakia, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Taiwan, United Kingdom and (obviously) the U.S.A. already have their official Trovan distributor !!!

Regarding the Malaysian microchip that can, among other things, be used in a subcutaneous way in humans, it is produced by the FEC company (http://www.fecinc.co.jp/) …

And of course, the dangers of all these subcutaneous microchips are the same, as to the possible applications and the numerous risks and drifts !!!

                                                                    



4. The true dangers of the microchip and of its functioning


     This new technology has multiple risks :

·        As we saw before, the microchip implant contains multiple data, and some of them are very personal (genealogy of the family, information on the tax reports, criminal record etc.). The use of such a microchip could be a blaring infringement of the rights on private life.
Currently, even policemen don’t have as many details on individuals !!! We should actually gather police information, banks information, information kept by the ministry of finances, by the courthouses and city halls, by the doctors and by the organisms of social security to be as precise and complete as what the microchip contains !

·        Given the current performances of the satellites (the most powerful ones are able to see, from space, the content of a magazine that we’re reading) and of the localization systems (GPS), we can fear that the microchip would be used to spy our slightest deeds. We could not only be localized and spotted, but also eventually be filmed at any moment. It’s of course an infringement of our most fundamental rights but also pure espionage. We can shudder when thinking about the applications that “one” could do from that implant. Freedom of association, of expression and even of choice is threatened ! In other words, thanks to a power of intimidation that has never been known before, the microchip implant opens royally the way to “Big Brother” !

·        And then, of course, there are immense risks for health : first, the risk of breaking of the microchip inside the organism, even if chances are tiny, would cause a painful and purulent wound due to the lithium contained in the battery, as we saw before; furthermore, given that the waves produced by the microchip have direct effects on the organism and on the behaviour, we can just imagine what kind of ravage this implant could cause on the health of the individuals ! And, by the way, spùe articmes were released showing that the waves spread by RFID technologies can break the DNA chain, which couls cause cancer ! Very recently, an article recognized the medical risks of the subcutaneous microchip for humans. These risks are the following :  adverse tissue reaction, migration of implanted transponder, failure of implanted transponder, electromagnetic interference, electrical hazards, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) incompatibility and needle stick. Regarding the magnetic resonance imagery (MRI), electrical currents may be induced in conductive metal implants that can cause 'potentially severe patient burns.'


·        But there is much worse…Let’s not be naïve : it’s not for nothing that the C.I.A. and eminent members of the government who were also involved in the control of the army had researches made on mind control thanks to waves and for the control of human beings ! We know that the energy that activates a neurotransmitter is transmitted by radio frequencies. One of the possibilities of  cerebral transmitters is to influence people’s behaviours (so that they would conform to political systems, by example). Individual and social behaviours, emotional and mental reactions can be aroused, maintained, modified or inhibited, for animals as well as for men, by stimulation of the specific cerebral structures. Concretely, what does it mean ? That one can, for instance, amplify the effect of the waves transmitted by the satellites thanks to the microchip. Because of the waves, an individual can produce more or less hormones. For example, “one” can have him producing more or less adrenalin, which will make him more or less anxious, aggressive etc. In other words, the subcutaneous microchip for humans is what is called a “mind control” device, and represents a serious risk of suppression of free-agency and of the liberty of thought !!!

.     Birth control risk : with the same means used for mind control (the microchip, waves of a certain frequency, satellites, GPS system, ground stations and antennas), births can be controlled too ! Since it is possible to stimulate or inhibit the hormone production, it also means that it’s possible to stop the production of oestrogens in women, and so it’s possible to cause a premature menopause !!! One can imagine the terrible consequences of such an application of the subcutaneous microchip if it falls between the hands of an unscrupulous government (which could be the case, since Sanders claimed that “the ultimate purpose of the powers controlling the world is to reduce the global population of 90% :  a size which, according to them, is easier to control”).

  We can then imagine this : a maximum of people “chipped” and a worldwide dictatorship beginning thanks to that microchip that transmits but also receives satellite waves, and that is used to send some specific wave frequencies in order to deliberately modify people’s behaviour or even to be used as a weapon in order to ruin the health of precised targets. What would we have then?

The answer is simple : we would then be in presence of a worldwide dictatorship whose eventual opponents would be quickly eliminated in all discretion ! And freedom of thought would disappear too ! “Big Brother” would be in possession of an army of human slaves deprived of any will and subjected to the slavery of that damned microchip !!!
 

   There is no more doubt to have after what you just read : THE SUBCUTANEOUS MICROCHIP IS THE RESULT OF A WORLDWIDE CONSPIRACY AND OF SECRET PROJECTS THAT WERE PREPARED FOR US FOR MORE THAN 35 YEARS !!!

   Obviously, the microchip implant is not found everywhere yet, and its use begins to be imposed only in the USA. But, of course, “this only happens to others”…

   Now would be the only time for us to move before the microchip is IMPOSED in our countries !  Because this will happen pretty soon, as the microchip already spreads on the planet and gets such a “strength of conviction” that few things will be able to be done to stop it, EXCEPT IF WE REACT FROM NOW ON !

   “But yet we live in democracy, so no one will come to impose that microchip !”. Yeah, maybe, but then you forgot one thing : some organizations of protection of private life already protested against the “digital angel” microchip. But their arguments were brushed aside by Applied Digital Solutions. “The expected benefits are more important than the worries about private life”, claimed Applied Digital Solutions’  ex-C.E.O., Richard Sullivan. What a wonderful morality, don’t you think ? As you can see, it’s the capitalist and neoliberal dictatorship that prevails on everything !

   After the so-called “terrorist” attacks of the 9th of September 2001, the USA voted, under the name “Patriot Act”, a certain amount of “anti-terrorist” laws that allow the government to get over the American constitution (that constitution which guarantees basic rights and freedoms of the citizen : freedom of the press, freedom of opinion, freedom of thought, freedom of association…). So the Patriot Act is a double edged weapon that could destroy, or even suppress, the liberties of American people !!!

But do you know that the U.S.A. are not the only ones who have anti-terrorist laws of exception ?   In France, the Perben law is, regarding the concept and the risks, a “twin” of the Patriot Act. In Belgium, the laws voted in July 2002 and the law of the 19th of December 2003 are also copies of the Patriot Act. In Canada, a project of the same style is under preparation ! This means that other countries inherited exception laws that have the same risks and drifts than the Patriot Act. These laws represent a REAL danger of totalitarian drift for all those countries. And in a fake democratic and fully totalitarian State, the use of the microchip can be totalitarian too !
 
  Moreover, the big business men who try to sell the subcutaneous microchip for humans are not that dumb ! We just saw the lethal dangers of the microchip implant, but they will introduce it to you with a honeyed voice and “full of good intentions”, and the microchip will be sold with a huge marketing campaign and “thanks to its wonderful applications” !!!

  But you must know this : A.D.S., in its project, doesn’t hide the fact that its microchip, among other uses, will be used in order to GIVE A FLAWLESS, ABSOLUTE AND UNFAILING IDENTIFICATION MODEL OF THE INDIVIDUAL. Now, you’re informed and warned about it !




Do you REALLY want to go through THIS ???



5. How “they” will try to make people accept
the microchip implant


     As we said above, the subcutaneous microchip will be introduced to us as a wonderful device so that we’ll accept it without a second thought. But never forget this : if you let them implant that crap in your body, it will be over with your free choice, your private life and your freedom !

   So here are some wicked arguments that were introduced by A.D.S. and its subsidiary company, Verichip. The verichip and the digital angel will be used for :

§         safety in Internet applications for all transactions concerning electronic exchanges (e-commerce, e-payments)

§         research and rescue of individuals, including lost children or kids taken as hostages etc.

§         medical monitoring of high-risk patients

§         supervision tracking and follow through of soldiers, diplomats or any other important member of a government

§         tracking, surveillance and checking of the authenticity of valuables

§         tracking, localization and follow through with the tracks or trails of people who like extreme sports (hiking, skiing, mountain climbing, sky diving etc.) and who could get hurt seriously after an accident

§         tracking and localization of kidnapped (or murdered) children
 

What a humanism !

Please notice that the words “supervision”, “tracking”, “surveillance”, “research”, “localization” and “checking” come back in a cyclic and almost obsessive way !

The microchip will be accepted by people because of so-called “safety” reasons : they will link the above beneficial effects of the microchip implant to the remedy against terrible events that will have occurred and that will - of course - supposedly  never occur again thanks to the microchip (those events will eventually have been created in that purpose or even deliberately wanted ; terrorist attacks, a particularly odious murder or a spectacular kidnapping,
by example !).

 The microchip will also be related to eases, notably financial or safety eases (“with that microchip in you, your money or your bank card will never be stolen anymore!”; “no more terrorists in airports : they’ll be detected and identified way before their coming !”, etc.).

Plus, the microchip will be “cool”, “fun”, and “trendy” !  It’s the embodiment of progress “that we can’t stop, anyway”… The only thing is to know what kind of “progress” we’re talking about !!!

   Financial arguments are very important for the development of the microchip implant : let’s not forget that since its conception, the microchip was thought in terms of worldwide government AND OF WORLDWIDE CURRENCY !

You’ll just need to put your hand (or your forehead) in front of an ad hoc scanner, and your “virtual bank account” will be automatically debited of the amount of your purchases. They’ll quickly replace bank cards, currencies and their “weaknesses” by the subcutaneous microchip, “unbeatable and hyper convenient”. Do you think this is only speculation ? Then, you should think twice ! For example, a certain professor Kevin Warwick, from the cybernetics department of the university of Reading (U.K.) and who was implanted with the microchip, claimed not so long ago (on the 10th of October 1999) during a television broadcast called “Souriez, vous êtes filmés” (“Smile, you’re filmed”) on the french speaking  channel Arte that “soon, bank cards (and of course the identity card, passport, social security card etc.) will be replaced by an electronic implant” !!!

   And what do we see today ? That the microchip contaminated more than 20 countries and is spread all around the world !!!

   Be sure that the subcutaneous microchip, conceived in a goal of unique and worldwide currency, will be proposed and then systematically imposed as the only “valid” means of payment and purchase, for the (fake) reasons written above.

   Furthermore, imagine the colossal profits that A.D.S. (and other companies producing subcutaneous microchips) will make from all those operations !!! This represents an extremely juicy market ! The patents were acquired by A.D.S. for the “modest” amount of $130 millions. Usually, you don’t spend such a fortune if you’re not sure to make benefits !

   But for those who will refuse the microchip implant, what will happen ??? They won’t be able to sell nor buy without that bloody implant, and they will have to survive like dropouts, bartering here and there…

   Some theories and hypothesis assert that this subcutaneous microchip will only be proposed, then imposed to us, after an enormous crash, a worldwide economical catastrophe…or that other options will be joined to the microchip implant to make it even more attractive (like the possibility to combine it with a cellphone, by example). Wait and see, but let’s be careful !

  Finally, the last pretexts to “chip” people are medical gibberish (and thus, humanistic and “indisputable”, since it’s about people’s health). The chip would allow to “save lives” by giving the vital information on people entering the hospital and being inconscious : their allergies, their blood type, their medical records etc. The microchip would also “enhance” the treatment of the patients’ records… Obviously, all of this is just pretext to spread a device whose dangers (even for health !) were already shown.

                                                                   
Knowing what you now know, will you get chipped, or will you let your child get chipped ?


Kids : an essential public and stake

 Children and teenagers always were a particular and “privileged” public for the scums making and selling subcutaneous microchips for humans.

WHY are kids so important to them ? Just because they are the NERVE OF THE “MICROCHIP  WAR' !

 We do love our children and we naturally want them to be safe. This is the perfect “breach” for the companies marketing the subcutaneous microchips for humans ! “We live in an unsafe world, full of terrorists, kidnappers, sexual offenders and other bogeymen”, do they whisper in our ears.

  To protect your kids in a safe way, you should have them be tracked electronically, or even microchipped, do they assert. The safety problem would then be “resolved” !

   These scumbags are playing with the parents’ emotions! Besides, chipping the children is also an indirect means to touch the adults too. By the time the parents will have got their kids “chipped” and note that, finally and apparently, “chipping” doesn’t seem something dangerous but, on the contrary, “protects” their children, they will be tempted to get chipped themselves ! BIG MISTAKE ! Because the risks are and will be there ! That’s how, in the U.S.A. or in Japan, some parents already begin to sacrifice (often without even noticing) the freedom of their kids for their so-called “safety” !
This is also how, in Mexico an Brasil (countries where kidnappings of children are “usual”), the chip industry succeeded in convincing some persons to have their children “chipped” !

 If the current adult generation still shows reluctance regarding this infernal implant, kids can be brainwashed more easily : they don’t have an analytical mind yet, and they can be “attracted” in a quite simple way. Showing films and cartoons to the kids in which chips and RFID related topics lie helps “sensibilizing” them. Watch closely the last movies that were released in the theatres, recent videogames or cartoons, and you’re gonna ba amazed by what you’ll find !

 Have your kids wearing RFID tags and even subcutaneous microchips at a young age, and within one or two generations, everybody will find that wearing this abject subdermal implant is NORMAL !!!  This is one of the main goals that people who market the subcutaneous microchips for humans (and the members of the new world order) want to reach !


 So please be very vigilant, and don’t fall in such an obvious trap ! AND MOST OF ALL, DON’T LET ANYONE “CHIP” YOUR CHILDREN, EDUCATE THEM AND SENSIBILIZE THEM TO THE LIBERTIES AND TRUE DEMOCRACY VALUES, DON’T LET YOURSELF GET FOOLED BY THE TRICKY ARGUMENTS OF THE INDUSTRIALS AND OF THE AUTHORITIES WHO, FOR SO-CALLED “SAFETY”, “HUMANISTIC”, “MEDICAL P ROTECTION” OR EASES REASONS (financial ease, fashion), WILL COME TO TEMPT YOU SO THAT YOU’LL GET YOUR CHILDREN OR GRANDCHILDREN  “CHIPPED” !!!


Applied Digital Solutions tries to erase the tracks…

   Since a couple of months, we can notice some technical differences regarding the verichip and ADS’ policy… Don’t let yourself get fooled ! ADS only tries to have a beautiful appearance of honorability, to erase the tracks trying to make people believe that the opponents of the microchip are wacky idiots, retrogrades, liars and so on.
Lately, Appplied Digital Solutions and its fully owned subsidiary company, Verichip Corporation, even created a “medical board” and a “privacy board” so that people would believe they’re just “honest, honorable and responsible people” who just want to make business !

For instance, the verichip, that had to contain basically  a unique 18 digits number divided in 3 groups of 6 digits (666), has only 16 digits in its current configuration. Nevertheless, nothing will prevent them from adding 2 digits later on (when the verichip would be already implanted all over the world)…

Also, the verichip is not implanted anymore in the back of the hand, at the moment : it is implanted in the back of the arm (triceps). All of this is obviously done in order to lure people and to discredit the Christians who think that this kind of product is the “mark of the Beast”…

NEVERTHELESS, you have to know that ADS comes back little by little to its first resolutions :  for instance, we can talk about the project aiming to use the verichip in order to unlock the triggers of “intelligent” fire weapons (smartguns) and that would mean that gun owners would be implanted… in the back of the hand !  So, you can see how sly this malevolent company is, and how easily they can lure you and fool you ! SO PLEASE STAY VIGILANT AND, WHATEVER HAPPENS, DON’T GET “CHIPPED” !

The verichip, which ought to be an active chip (receiving and transmitting data at any time and without you knowing), is, in its current configuration, a passive chip (which is only activated when a scanner goes over the microchip)… BUT you must know that the project of  making the verichip an active chip is still there and that ADS thinks enthusiastically about it !

In fact, nothing prevents ADS to release on the market a first version of its subcutaneous microchip for humans and, once that model will be well spread and accepted, to introduce a second model which will have all the characteristics mentioned in the beginning of this article ! Besides, the dangers for your health, the risk of suppression of your privacy and the immense peril of mind control still remains !




6. The microchip implant quoted in the Bible ?


   Even if you’re not a believer, I think that this little chapter might be very useful to you.

   The Bible (yes, that “old book” that is more than 2000 years old !), contains plenty of messages and codes (simple or mysterious). In the last part of the Bible, called the Apocalypse of St John or “Revelations”, the author tells us about what was revealed to him regarding the period of the latter days and that leads to the return of Jesus Christ.

   That part of the Bible is particularly difficult to understand in a precise way because John uses numerous images  to tell us about “the end of times”. It is notably told about the Antichrist, about fake prophets, about the “Beast” and “the Mark of the Beast” that will all try to cause the loss of humankind. John also describes Judgement Day and the way that God will send warnings  and “plagues” on Earth, then will sort out the Good ones and the Bad ones.

   The weirdest thing is that this part of the Bible, that had always seemed enigmatic, begins to be able to be interpreted, in parts only, but way more clearly since a little while !
So, many Christians made a more than “strange” parallel between the mark of the Beast and the subcutaneous microchip. Dr. Sanders himself, after realizing the danger of the microchip, was convinced that the microchip implant was indeed the cursed mark quoted in the Bible.

   See by yourself :

   (Revelations, 13:4-5, 16-17-18) : “And they worshiped the dragon which gave power unto the beast…and there was given unto him a mouth speaking great things and blasphemies… And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads : and that no man might buy or sell, save he that has the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name. Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding  count the number of the beast : for it is the number of a man, and his number is six hundred threescore and six (666).”

 
    When you know that the subcutaneous microchip for humans works to the maximum of its functions in the back of the hand or in the forehead (because those 2 places are the places in the body that change their temperature the most easily, allowing the tiny lithium battery to reload through thermoelectricity), it seems amazing, doesn’t it ?

    When we know that the companies making that chip want to generalize it on a worldwide scale and that the microchip has financial ambitions aiming to create a cashless society where money would only be “virtual” (thus, unique), one can guess that in a society that would be dominated by the use of the microchip as a means of payment, those who wouldn’t own that chip and who wouldn’t be implanted couldn’t buy or sell a thing. One more troubling element in relationship with the Revelations…

    And when we know that the number 666 is part of that microchip (see chapter 2 above: History of the subcutaneous microchip), you begin to think that there are A LOT of “coincidences” (way too much , in fact) once you compare it to the verses of the Revelations quoted above.

   Another quote from the Bible : (Revelations, 16:2) : 'The first angel went and poured out his bowl on the land, and ugly and painful sores broke out on the people who had the mark of the beast and worshiped his image.'

   When you know that the microchip has a lithium battery that would cause, once it’s broken, a painful wound filled with pus, you think immediately about the Bible quote.

   Question : would we be witnessing the latter days period ?

   The Bible, through the Revelations, warns us severely so that we won’t accept the mark of the beast, and encourages us to live following God’s commandments :

(Revelations, 14:9-12) : “And the third angel followed them, saying with a loud voice : If any man worship the beast and his image, and receive his mark in his forehead or in his hand… The same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out without mixture into the cup of his indignation; and he shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels, and in the presence of the Lamb. And the smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever and ever : and they have no rest day nor night, who worship the beast and his image, and whosoever receiveth the mark of his name. Here is the patience of the saints : here are they that keep the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus.”

   But the Bible also tells us that refusing the mark of the beast has some risks :

(Revelations, 20:4) : “…and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had had not worshipped the beast, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, and in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years.”

    Thus, the final victory belongs to those who won’t have accepted the mark of the beast. But it’s also here that lies the true question : are you ready to be unable to sell or buy anything and eventually to live from barter, like dropouts, because you refused the mark (=microchip implant) ? And furthermore : are you ready to be persecuted or to die because of that decision (cf. the theme of the beheading and of the resurrection in the excerpt
above) ?

    Or do you prefer losing your freedom, your free agency and your soul accepting a microchip implanted in your hand or in your forehead ???

     Will you prefer dying as a slave, or as a free and conscious man ???

   It’s the question that you’ll have to think about from now on, for when the times has come, you’ll have to choose your camp, and there will be no alternative or compromise ! Anyway, one thing is certain : you cannot tell that, believer or not, you weren’t warned about the risks and dangers of the microchip implant, be they religious or not !

                                                                     
Subcutaneous microchip for humans : the 'Mark of the Beast' ?



7) Technologies that are complementary to
 the microchip implant


  We’re going to talk now, in a non exhaustive way, about some existing technologies that might be associated to the subcutaneous microchip to make it more “perfect” or to raise manipulation and control of minds, bodies and behaviours.

   Please remember this : all that is said in this part of the article already exists now; if you didn’t hear about it in the mass medias or if you don’t hear about it anymore at the moment, it doesn’t mean that “they” aren’t planning things out of our knowledge !


A) Cybernetics :

   This part of technology is only (officially !) at its first steps of development. Nevertheless, some articles, such as the one that was published in the Washington Post of the 28th of August 2001, can’t leave us indifferent.. It’s also possible to visit the French site http://www.lemonde.fr and to ask to check the edition of the 15th of November 2001.

   The article is about a discovery that allows to have living brain cells interacting with an electronic circuit made of silicium  parts. The experiment  consisted in making a “partially living” electronic circuit made of numerous snail neurones glued to tiny transistors. The cells were communicating between them and with the silicium pads.

The applications that were thought about for this discovery were : developing artificial retinas and prosthesis that would be extensions of the human nervous system (!), helping the blind to regain sight and the paralysed to “make objects move just by the thought”, building computers that would be as inventive and adaptable as our own nervous system, building a generation of robots that would really deserve to be called “intelligent”.

     Aside those wonderful “humanist” applications, you can already imagine the dangers of such a technology that truly plays with the living !


B) The HAARP project :


  The HAARP (High-frequency Active Auroral Research Project) is a project of the U.S. Army and of the oil company “Apti-Arco” and that replaced the “Star Wars”  project, even though HAARP is land based. Powerful and polyvalent, HAARP takes advantage of the ionosphere (layer of the atmosphere that is located above the stratosphere and constituted of ionised particles that are highly charged in energy) in order to use it as an energy weapon. For complete information on this topic, you can visit the following website : http://www.conspiration.cc (in French).
 There, if you search a little bit, you will find a nice file about HAARP.

    HAARP facility is a huge installation of several hectares located in Gakona, Alaska. It’s a vast deforested and flat perimeter, flanked by 48 antennas that are 28 metres high; each of them is linked to a transmitter that’s a little bit less powerful than one million watts. The use of HAARP is the following : they bombard the ionosphere with extremely high frequency waves. The ionosphere is then transformed in some kind of enormous virtual “mirror” that acts like an antenna. That virtual antenna will retransmit extremely low frequency waves, which creates some kind of “gigantic microwave oven” in a specific part of the ionosphere.

    The applications of HAARP :

·        Interrupting all kind of Hertzian communication and broadcast

·        Destroying jets or missiles in the sky or messing up their electronic radars

·        Causing explosions as powerful as an atomic bomb

·        Modifying the weather

·        Influencing human behaviours (since we saw that waves can influence the behaviour, and given the power of HAARP, we can imagine the terrifying use that could be done from it ! This is where there could be a link with the microchip implant : HAARP could work like a powerful relay with satellites or like a gigantic transmitter for mind control over populations ! ).




C) Liquid crystals vaccines :

   Among the novelties regarding vaccination, we find liquid crystals vaccines…We know that
D.N.A. is constituted of liquid crystals. The idea of liquid crystals vaccines about injecting in the organism (by intra muscular way, for instance) some “nude D.N.A.” which is made of repetitive sequences of D.N.A. (that D.N.A. can be synthetic) that are the supports of cellular information. On those repetitive sequences of D.N.A. are transplanted either sequences of viral D.N.A. or coding genes for viral or bacterial proteins. The integration of that genetic material to our cells is very quick, and we can’t control the synthesis of the proteins that are made afterwards, as they are integrated to our genetic heritage. Problem : when you’re injected a vaccine, who knows what’s in it, exactly ? Who knows if it’s a “traditional” vaccine or a liquid crystals vaccine ? Even the doctor who injects it to you sincerely ignores it !

   But the question that is asked here is once more in relationship with the control of individuals : that “foreign” D.N.A. that is implanted through a vaccine, isn’t it some kind of “antenna” that could be programmed from the outside and that is introduced in our organism in order to reach objectives that could be very different from the humanist health purpose ? Are we sure that there is no risk that, stimulated by some external phenomenon (a precise wavelength transmitted by satellites and that would be relayed by a microchip implanted in the body, for instance), those D.N.A. (and virus) particles, once integrated in our organism, wouldn’t activate our immunity system, but on the contrary would slow it down or stop it, or would produce toxins or lethal viruses ? Then, it would be some massive technique of control used against people, with a cellular antenna that would short-circuit the individual
consciousness ! Some people are seriously wondering about this, notably in Quebec and in the U.S.A. . The very great book of Anne Givaudan, “Les dossiers sur le gouvernement mondial” (“The files about the worldwide government”), is very explicit regarding the role of vaccines, a role that is not very curative (some even have serious side effects !).



D) The chemtrails :


   The “chemtrails” (chemical trails) are tracks made by the reactors of jets and airplanes. But they’re not the usual condensation trails (“contrails”) !

   On the contrary, chemtrails are made of chemical particles falling over the populations living in the villages above which the jet dropped its dangerous cargo !!!

   The characteristics of these chemical trails is the expansion that they reach in the sky and their “life expectancy” : looking like condensation trails at first, they spread so much that they look like “expanded clouds” and sometimes, they can remain more than 30 minutes or even hours in the sky before disappearing. The goal of those “chemical operations” is not well known yet : testing the resistance of populations to some chemicals or testing the toxicity of these chemicals ? Spreading viruses or bacteriological weapons upon a given area ? Helping the rise of the greenhouse effect ? Spreading chemicals that will reinforce the power and the effects of the HAARP ?

   Anyway, one thing is certain : governments are usually involved in these chemical operations, and the Congress of the U.S.A. even recognized chemtrails as “exotic weapons”. For a more complete information concerning chemtrails, please visit Nenki’s website (in French), Nenki whose last book talks about this very topic : http://www.conspiration.cc

       

E) Nanotechnology :

   Nanotechnology is based on the “conquest of the infinitely small”. In this kind of technology, scientists work at the scale of a nanometre (nm), which means the billionth part of a metre, or 80.000 times less than the thickness of a hair !

   What is produced with the help of this technology is thus made at the molecular or atomic scale.

   Like all the other technologies that can bring “big money”, one tries to develop it to the maximum, boasting its “humanist” and humanitarian qualities, but in reality, dangerous applications could be made with it (and we’re getting there, as you’ll see…). Europe wishes to create an industrial nanotechnology platform and, only for 2003, the European Union will grant 700 millions of euros (!) for nanotechnological researches. So much money is probably not given for charity purposes, as you can figure…

  This is how, without hiding or even blushing, the European Commission (whose Mr. Philippe Busquin, ancient Belgian politician who became European Commissioner for research, is the ambassador) will finance, among other projects, “D.N.A. matrices and biochips”, in order to develop a disposable biochip for cheap D.N.A. analyses… Incredible, but true !

   No, honestly, our good old Europe is not sheltered !

   Big question : by introducing nanochips or nanorobots in our body, what are the risks ? For if these nanochips can be used to “spot cancerous cells” or to heal a disease inside the human body, why couldn’t they be used to destroy that same body ?  After all, this is only a matter of intention and of programming… And if these nanochips can modify some of the DNA genes, we can be VERY afraid ! Now, you also understand how the microchip, that is only one millimetre long, can contain 250.000 pieces !




F) Biometrics :

   Biometrics is the science that calculates the measurements of a human organ. But today, the applications mostly made it a means of control and identity check. Noticing that fingerprints are permanent and unique, that they are created before birth and that their pattern stays the same for life, our good old industry, without any morality, used them in order to create identification systems based on fingerprints, on the morphology of the hand or on the iris of the eye (the latter being the most reliable method).

   But of course, once again we are shown the wonderful eases and the lightning progress that are offered by this technology : over with passwords and confidential codes that are difficult to remember; over with the risks of theft, oblivion, transfer etc.


G) Other means to oppress or chain human beings :
                   
   We have now so many means to use the environment, the animals and the people like guinea pigs or to turn them into mindless zombies that we’re lacking room to detail them all : let’s list, among other things, the problem of genetically modified organisms (G.M.O.s), the cloning and all the other possible genetic drifts, but also the weapons and programs of the C.I.A. destined to control the human mind and behaviour. The following site will give you a good idea about those C.I.A. programs :
http://hometown.aol.com/ccapt2001/comportement2b.html


H) The “Brain machine interface program” :

   Finally, I must tell you about D.A.R.P.A.’s inhuman project to chain the human mind and
body : this project based on microchips implanted in the brain, in the nerves, on the neurones or on soft tissues of the body (!) is called “Brain machine interface program”. It allows, thanks to cerebral chips that act more or less like “remote controls”, to control totally (like remote controlled cars !) the implanted animals and humans; this hideous device is also the base for the development of “telepathy” and “telekynesy” through the material means offered by those cerebral microchips that act as a relay. In fact, this invention allows the individual to act on the outer world thanks to microchips and microelectrodes, but it also allows the “outer world” to act on the individual and to control him ! Thanks to that technological horror, no more free-agency and no more control on yourself, be it at the level of thoughts or even at the level of movements ! And considering the very delicate parts of the body where this device is placed (on neurones or on nerves), removing this implant would be very dangerous, it would require a heavy surgical operation and could even cause irreversible
sequels !

  Lately, human volunteer patients who had the Parkinson’s disease were used as guinea pigs for those revolting experiments. All of this, of course, under fake humanist pretexts like “tests to help those patients to heal from their disease” or to “improve their daily life”… Let’s not forget that D.A.R.P.A. (Defence Advanced Research Projects Agency) is a military institution for defence, and so, that its projects aren’t focused on humanism and on the well being of people, unlike what they’re trying to make us believe ! Try these words (“brain machine interface program”) in a search engine and you'll find websites regarding this awful program.

   In order to know a bit more about the brain machine interface program, I give you the web address of this very well documented file (in 4 parts) : http://www.angelfire.com/d20/philadelphians/MMEA.html

                                                       
A chip in the brain, that will turn you into a slave, and that you won't be able to remove anymore... Are you interested ?

 Regarding neural and brain chips, other noticeable inventions are the BrainGate and the Neuroport, both developed by the company Cyberkinetics. Just like the Brain Machine Interface Program, they claim to have only “medical” and “humanist” purposes, but they show the very same dangers and drifts than the Brain machine interface program ! Please be aware that these inventions are not only what they seem to be : they ALSO are a means to CONTROL THE POPULATIONS, physically AND spiritually !!! With all of these liberticide technologies (= technologies that KILL the liberties), the worst Orwellian nightmares are about to come true !!!

   In one word, to the light of all these technologies and techniques, we can assert the following statement : always presented with wonderful and beneficial arguments and intentions, those inventions are often discovered in industrial and/or military environment, which always makes them potential weapons because they’re only dedicated to power or benefit at all costs. The biggest mistake of humankind nowadays, is to consider any thing, any being and the most precious gift (=life) as a simple merchandise, and to have been tempted to sacrifice spiritual things at the benefit of material things. We’re getting to a time where a very important choice will have to be made : either we’ll choose a change that, finally, will bring back true values, or then we’ll go for nonchalance and tolerance for all those horrors that are already happening now, and in that case it will be a long and painful road…

    Like Anne Givaudan stated in her book : “Technology without love leads to draught, be it
of your planet or of yourself”. In order to finish this chapter, we’ll say that our world really needs awareness and a lot of love to see a better reality taking place.

   And now, we have to conclude this long article…




8) Conclusions


   This article is certainly not destined to scare you and has no pretension, but its goal is to inform a maximum of persons about the danger that’s about to knock on our door… Does reality seem dark to you ? OK. But it’s not because it’s dark that nothing can be done. We are the actors who build the world every day, and the vile system that is prepared for us won’t be able to succeed if the population, worldwide, stands against that system. But we must change our views and react, we must have the courage to leave our little comfort behind and to shout out loud our disapproval. And moreover, we must keep ourselves informed and be careful regarding the information that we’re given, checking everything systematically (let’s not forget that our medias are under the command of the government and are part of big multinational companies that are at the origin of the problem, so what these medias broadcast is usually fake or deformed information).

   If your heart and your consciousness vibrated or woke up while reading this article, then please go on with this information task and tell your friends, your family, your colleagues or broadcast this message to the max (in English or in a foreign language, because the message must be heard everywhere, the whole world must know and react). Then, only if we all react against what some insane persons planned for our future, then we’ll be able to avoid a worldwide catastrophe. On the other hand, there are numerous well documented websites (some of them are in the next chapter about references) where you’ll find additional information. Should you have some more doubts regarding the facts presented in this article, these websites will help you to see the truth…

   Don’t forget : during World War II, the few people who knew about the existence of death camps or who had succeeded in escaping from those camps had tried to alert public opinion. Very few people believed them; people couldn't believe that humans could be so cruel and that they could commit such horrible things. But when the camps were opened at the end of the war, the amazement and the disgust were big...
This article was written in the one and only goal to warn you, so that we'll be able  to avoid a catastrophic future, and so that you'll refuse that devilish microchip implant !

And please, don't hide the truth to yourself : our countries are NOT sheltered from that plague. Remember : some meetings which Dr. Sanders attended and that happened 'in a context of a worldwide government and of a unique currency' took place in Brussels and in Luxemburg, in the very heart of our so 'clean and honest' Europe, which is already touched by the scourge of the “verichip” !!!

   Whatever happens, should you or your children ever be proposed or imposed in the future to  get implanted with the subcutaneous microchip, you'll know what to answer!
   NO MATTER WHAT IT COSTS, NO MATTER WHAT HAPPENS, say NO to slavery for you and for the generations to come, NO to the unique thought and to the death of the mind, NO to the Mark of the Beast, and REFUSE THIS ABOMINATION OF THE MICROCHIP IMPLANT !